On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Dinesh B Vadhia <dineshbvad...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Kent > > The citation without the name is perfect (and this appears to be how most > citation parsers work). There are two issues in the test run: > > 1. The parallel citation 422 U.S. 490, 499 n. 10, 95 S.Ct. 2197, 2205 n. > 10, 45 L.Ed.2d 343 (1975) is resolved as: > > 422 U.S. 490 (1975) > 499 n. 10 (1975) > 95 S.Ct. 2197 (1975) > 2205 n. 10 (1975) > 45 L.Ed.2d 343 (1975)
> 2. It doesn't parse the last citation ie. 463 U.S. 29, 43, 103 S.Ct. 2856, > 2867, 77 L.Ed.2d 443 (1983). I tested it on another sample text and it > missed the last citation too. Another attempt attached, it recognizes the n. separator and gets the last item. Kent _______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
