Richard D. Moores wrote:
I've always disliked using "if not n % 2"  to test for even/odd ints
because of its convoluted logic.

I don't find it convoluted. It's not quite as straightforward as a hypothetical "if even(n)", but it's pretty straightforward. Perhaps you just need to get used it it.


> But I ran some speed tests and found
it was the way to go over "if n % 2 == 0". By my tests, it's 4.3% to
9.5% faster, depending on the integer tested - size and whether odd or
even.

I suspect that the time difference you're seeing has nothing to do with it being even or odd, but merely random fluctuations.But regardless, this truly is a micro-optimization. Given the results you show, you potentially save all of (approx) 0.0000004 second per test.



 See the speed testing script and results at
<http://tutoree7.pastebin.com/iragLgDz>.


You missed what I predict will be even faster:

def x3(n):
    return not n % 2



--
Steven

_______________________________________________
Tutor maillist  -  [email protected]
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor

Reply via email to