My personal opinion (with whatever limited weight that has on this list since I've only answered a few questions - and probably half of them I've accidentally only sent to the op)/how I read it is that RFC 2822 actually allows lists to set reply-to header; by my view the list software is forwarding to everyone else and therefor counts as the most recent sender/author. I admit that that is a somewhat different conclusion to others that I've read as to the meaning of 2822, but that seems logical to me and also my personal preference is for having the reply-to header be set to the list address. Nick
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Albert-Jan Roskam <fo...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > To summarize existing opinions on this matter: > > > > http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/listreplyto.html > > > > You might want to familiarize yourself with existing literature on the > > matter before starting a new flame war. > > Hmmm... False alarm? > > Page blocked > > The page you've been trying to access was blocked. > Reason: Access Denied! The requested URL is a Spyware site. > Transaction ID is 5107F01CFF920603D57F. > _______________________________________________ > Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor >
_______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
