On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:26 AM, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info>wrote:
I assumed Marc was talking hypothetically. A print function *could* > return a result, even if Python's print function does not. > > Actually, I was mixing up my memory of an overloaded print() function with Python's built-in print(). I _have_ used versions of print() that returned values, and relied on them for program flow - but somehow I forgot that that was a custom function! Yet another argument in the ongoing controversy "why change print from a statement to a function?"
_______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor
