On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 2:00 AM, PGage <[email protected]> wrote: > [snip]. I wish > they had a list of films that were worth the extra money for 3D, and those > that can be seen in 2D without any loss.
Given how conditioned we all are by a lifetime of watching 2D media, I venture to say that nothing needs to be seen in 3D unless you enjoy the effect. Having said that, I confess to seeing "Despicable Me" in RealD 3D in order to experience the gags that run during the credits, which are 3D-specific. And which, I expect, make just as much sense in 2D. jd -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
