Sorry, Jon, I didn't mean that some requoting, in context, isn't welcomed. But when reading this group in digest form, having to scroll past requotes of entire posts, especially when no one has trimmed them at any point, makes this a chore rather than a pleasurable activity.
And note to Joe Coughlin: You just made me hate people who think phones are for e-mail even more than I did previously. I have resisted doing any kind of Internet access on my cell phone; in fact, up until my last upgrade (made necessary by losing what I thought was the best basic cell phone I ever owned) I refused to even have a phone with camera. Still don't use the camera, haven't even set the phone up to download into my computer. Perhaps I am in the minority by taking the digest rather than individual posts? Or perhaps what I see as common courtesy in replying -- going back to the days of Usenet newsgroups being popular, and flame wars starting over massive requoting -- is seen as an unnecessary bother by others? On Jul 31, 10:57 am, Jon Delfin <jondel...@gmail.com> wrote: > But requoting *none* of it sometimes makes for messages that make no > sense whatsoever. To me, at least. So a key point or two for > context..... -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
