I suppose we'll find out in a couple of years, but I remember when Dave was considered the heir apparent to Johnny for years before the Leno/Kushnick drama, and Dave, in respect to Johnny, never lobbied for it, never told anyone in the press that he was clamoring for the job. It would have seemed unseemly.
A similar dynamic _may_ be taking place in regards to SCG. On May 19, 1:23 am, PGage <pga...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:48 PM, donz5 <do...@aol.com> wrote: > > I trust you're kidding re the interview being taped 18 months ago. > > > It was taped the same day as broadcast, Thursday, May 17. > > > This was the first time Dave got to talk to Conan about the fun times > > 18 months, so why not focus on that? > > > As to Conan replacing Dave: as we've noted several times, SCG already > > has that guaranteed in his contract, per Bill Carter's book. > > Yes, I was joking about the 18 months. I just meant that the spent the > whole first segment talking about the Conan-Lenon thing, without really any > context or apology, as if it were still a current event. As I noted, I > didn't mind, but I was hoping for a bit more than that. > > I am aware of the SCG issue. My point there is that I increasingly do not > really see that happening, both because I don't think CBS will want it, and > I because I don't think he will want it, though admittedly that is > influenced by my growing lack of interest in Ferguson as a talk show host, > and my perception that he seems to me not really interested in being a talk > show host. I am not sure what a 11:35 show with Ferguson would be. -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
