Maybe you can do it in Javascipt on the Browser?

Richard

On Dec 2, 3:24 am, "Andrew Badera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Which reinforces my "it's a GAE problem" stance ... GAE needs to accept the
> reality of the demands that will be placed on that system. Long-running
> operations against foreign servers is one among many such issues.
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 9:23 PM, Amir Michail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 1, 9:08 pm, Amir  Michail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Dec 1, 8:15 pm, "Andrew Badera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > The timeout I see as more of a GAE issue, not a Twitter one. You get
> > what
> > > > you pay for, on both sides of that equation.
>
> > > It's not a CPU usage issue in the GAE.  It's just that the request to
> > > the twitter search API takes too long and urlfetch times out in the
> > > GAE.
>
> > > Hopefully a timeout parameter will be added to urlfetch soon...
>
> > > Amir
>
> > Actually...
>
> > "Increasing the timeout in production isn't possible at present, and
> > you'll always be bound by our overall request limits."
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/msg/f59528628a3bb86e
>
> > Amir
>
> > > > No SLA, no billing from Twitter, beta and no billing on GAE's part ...
> > and I
> > > > think we can agree, GAE hasn't been particular forthcoming nor
> > cooperative
> > > > about what constitutes a true mcycle or a long-running request.
>
> > > > That said, perhaps there's some optimization to be done on OR ...
>
> > > > Thanks-
> > > > - Andy Badera
> > > > - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > - (518) 641-1280
>
> > > > -http://higherefficiency.net/
> > > > -http://changeroundup.com/
>
> > > > -http://flipbitsnotburgers.blogspot.com/
> > > > -http://andrew.badera.us/
>
> > > > - Google me:http://www.google.com/search?q=andrew+badera
>
> > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Amir Michail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > Hi,
>
> > > > > OR search queries can take a long time and are causing lots of
> > > > > timeouts with google app engine.
>
> > > > > Amir

Reply via email to