On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Waitman Gobble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, if you're like me you don't really need any cheerleaders to > fluff you up and get you going. I mean they're nice and all, but > stubborn persistence regardless. > > And besides, we'd not have much of this stuff if it weren't for some > renegades with stubborn idears. You know, the Internet Cowboys. Guys > who would crowbar their ways onto the rooftops of bank hi-rises just > to set up satellite dishes and offer wireless internet when most > people never even heard of broadband. Or rent a back hoe and chaw > through public streets without permit to run copper. Back in the > 1990's. Those types. Where would we be now? > > The thing I'm missing in your proposal - I can't see the nookie. I > mean, are users getting a higher quality of selection of tweets > because you do the Turing exam? Or are they going to get more > followers because you have a pool of twitters at the other end waiting > for them? (because of the quality of feed).
Suppose you have two twitter users who are each working on a web 2.0 startup and would like to increase the number of their twitter followers to better their chances of startup success. They could go to this service to increase their followers. So in using this service, they find each other. Even though they don't necessarily want to increase the number of people they follow, they might discover cool tweets that they would like to see anyway. And so they end up following each other, even though it was not their intent to follow more people. Amir > > Not cutting, just trying to understand. > > Waitman > > > > > On Dec 8, 7:11 pm, "Amir Michail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Waitman Gobble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > ... >> >> > Anyways, back to the original topic. >> >> > I don't understand WHERE these "Them" are going to submit. (re: >> > original post). I guess that's what I'm missing. >> >> > Waitman >> >> At the service using the twitter API that I'm thinking of building. I >> didn't realize this idea was so difficult to understand though. Maybe >> I shouldn't even try... >> >> Amir >> >> >> >> > On Dec 8, 5:54 pm, Cameron Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> It's because people who are new, or considered new due to few posts, are >> >> automatically put in the moderation queue. >> >> spam, which I'm sure >> >> --http://b4utweet.comhttp://chatbotgame.comhttp://numbrosia.comhttp://twitter.com/amichail > > > > -- http://b4utweet.com http://chatbotgame.com http://numbrosia.com http://twitter.com/amichail
