You do a ton of great things, Matt. We all make mistakes, but you and
the rest of the crew there do a bang-up job.

--
Ed Finkler
http://funkatron.com
Twitter:@funkatron
AIM: funka7ron
ICQ: 3922133
XMPP:funkat...@gmail.com


On May 7, 11:24 am, Matt Sanford <m...@twitter.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>      I left last night while they were rolling this back to the old  
> long format addresses. Re-reading the logs this morning it seems like  
> there was some sort of problem and it was rolled back. Waiting for the  
> engineer in question so I can find out more details but based on what  
> I'm seeing it looks like an unrelated problem. I expect the long-style  
> addresses to be re-deployed with our first deploy today.
>
>      As far as poor communication: that's fair. I made this change  
> after talking with the mail processing folks (ok, the guy) and product  
> folks and I broke your filters. I'm sorry about that and when you  
> brought it up I fixed the issue, wrote the tests, replied to the mails  
> and begged the deploy engineer to make it an emergency. I tried to  
> communicate things.
>
>      I should have told the list (and probably posted to  
> blog.twitter.com) this user-facing email change was coming … surprise  
> is overrated. I definitely should have thought more about how it would  
> effect filtering. Totally my bad … you can send flaming sacks of dog  
> poop to REDACTED.
>
> Thanks;
>   – Matt "Can do no right" Sanford
>
> On May 7, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Chad Etzel wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Matt,
>
> > When you decide on the final format and deploy, will you let us know,
> > please?  I'm leaving my email filters in limbo until then.
>
> > Thanks,
> > -Chad
>
> > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 12:59 AM, TjL <luo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> *sigh*
>
> >> Seriously? I've already started telling people to change their  
> >> filters
> >> and now they're going to break *again*.
>
> >> This is why daddy drinks.
>
> >> All kidding aside, I don't understand how a change like this gets
> >> pushed out without the left hand knowing WTF the right hand is  
> >> doing —
> >> which is what it looks like (from an outsider's perspective)  
> >> happened.
>
> >> IMO/FWIW: You've gotten too big to make these sorts of changes  
> >> without
> >> more consideration and communication. It makes me look bad as a
> >> developer, and it makes Twitter look bad.
>
> >> The irony is that you're a company built around communication.
>
> >> TjL
>
> >> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Matt Sanford <m...@twitter.com>  
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> Hi all,
>
> >>>   The change in from address was meant to fix the 'allow images'  
> >>> but in the
> >>> process broke some ISP spam filters, some spam reporting, and a  
> >>> great many
> >>> people's mail filters. We're working on rolling that back now.  
> >>> Sorry for the
> >>> disruption.
>
> >>> Thanks;
> >>> – Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
> >>>    Twitter Dev
>
> >>> On May 6, 2009, at 3:13 PM, TjL wrote:
>
> >>>> FWIW I think "nore...@twitter.com" is the right choice, it's  
> >>>> certainly
> >>>> a lot easier for image display, etc.
>
> >>>> But it sounds like John Adams thinks this is going to change  
> >>>> back. I
> >>>> hope this will be clarified.
>
> >>>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Matt Sanford <m...@twitter.com>  
> >>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Hi there,
>
> >>>>>  We had changed the from address to try and improve bounce  
> >>>>> reporting and
> >>>>> prevent being marked as spam by major ISPs. When we added the HTML
> >>>>> formatting we found that we needed a consistent address for the  
> >>>>> 'always
> >>>>> display images' option in many clients so we changed things  
> >>>>> around again.
> >>>>> Hopefully this will be the last change as it causes us a bunch  
> >>>>> of work as
> >>>>> well. I'll keep an eye out for future changes and try and let  
> >>>>> people
> >>>>> know.
>
> >>>>> Thanks;
> >>>>> – Matt Sanford / @mzsanford
> >>>>>   Twitter Dev
>
> >>>>> On May 6, 2009, at 2:53 PM, TjL wrote:
>
> >>>>>> The email notifications for new followers used to come from  
> >>>>>> (From:)
>
> >>>>>> Twitter <nore...@twitter.com>
>
> >>>>>> then it changed to
>
> >>>>>> Twitter <twitter-follow-emailname=domain....@postmaster.twitter.com
>
> >>>>>> then it changed to
>
> >>>>>> Twitter <nore...@twitter.com>
>
> >>>>>> again.
>
> >>>>>> Every time you do this, every single person using TwitReport  
> >>>>>> has to
> >>>>>> change their filters, and I spend 2 weeks, at least, explaining  
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>> people why it stopped working, and some number of people probably
> >>>>>> assume that things are broken on my end and stop using it  
> >>>>>> altogether.
>
> >>>>>> I'm not making a dime off of this project (nor do I want to),  
> >>>>>> it's
> >>>>>> something that I'm doing to make Twitter a bit nicer to use, but
> >>>>>> having something as basic as this change twice and break the  
> >>>>>> entire
> >>>>>> thing is a bit of a pain in the ass and a not-insignificant  
> >>>>>> waste of
> >>>>>> time.
>
> >>>>>> So I hope that y'all will keep this one, since you've liked it  
> >>>>>> enough
> >>>>>> to use it twice now :-)
>
> >>>>>> THAT SAID, I'm glad that the *format* of the notifications has
> >>>>>> improved. I certainly think that is the right way to go.
>
> >>>>>> - TjL
>
>

Reply via email to