Yes Adam you are right - BUT if Twitter are "playing favorites" then they should come out and say so.
Everyone knows that the Apple approval process for the App store sucks and is biased...So when Google Voice got rejected Google knew going into it that the Apple process is biased and sucks. At the moment on one hand we have Twitter saying hey we have this great API go build and prosper....... And on the other hand you have legal departments contradicting the CEO that it's ok to name your apps "Tweet"X If Twitter support dealt with everyone on an equal first come first served basis then it would be fine.....or said they weren't and were going to support only some people, also fine. Just make a statement one way or the other instead of jerking us around, there are plenty of other things I can be spending my time doing. Regards, Dean Collins d...@mytwitterbutler.com <mailto:d...@mytwitterbutler.com?subject=i'm%20being%20Sued> +1-212-203-4357 New York +61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial). +44-20-3129-6001 (London in-dial). ________________________________ From: twitter-development-talk@googlegroups.com [mailto:twitter-development-t...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Adam Cloud Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:13 PM To: twitter-development-talk@googlegroups.com Subject: [twitter-dev] Re: Suspended Account - Need Help!!! On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Robert Banh <robert.b...@gmail.com> wrote: Twitter is free. I'm happy to trade small downtime/performance for something free. That's my 2-cents. Amen. I thought the same thing when i saw the original posters "Why isn't Twitter being consistent in their approach to all vendors". Their is no contract between the "vendors" and Twitter. And speculating that twitter uses favoritism (as if they didn't have the right to do so) and then asking them why they are doing the speculated actions is ridiculous!
