I wonder if a query language like what Facebook has with its FQL might
help here. ;-)

--
Kyle Mulka
http://twilk.com

On Oct 14, 10:30 pm, Chad Etzel <c...@twitter.com> wrote:
> I agree. I'm lobbying the team for something like this.
> -Chad
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Josh Roesslein <jroessl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yeah we really need a way to bulk request user payloads by giving a list of 
> > IDs.
>
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Tim Haines <tmhai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Are you suggesting I should retrieve the 2k users 1 at a time from
> >> users/show once I have the ids?  I'd essentially like to do this, but
> >> 100 at a time.
>
> >> I know I can get the 7000 ids in 2 calls (1 even without the cursors)
> >> - but I actually want the whole user objects..
>
> >> Tim.
>
> >> On Oct 15, 2:56 pm, Chad Etzel <c...@twitter.com> wrote:
> >>> If you are pulling down the entire social graph, why not use the
> >>> social graph calls which would deliver all 7000 ids in 2 calls?
>
> >>> You can also parallelize this process by looping through different
> >>> users on each thread instead of using each thread to grab a different
> >>> page/cursor of the same user.
>
> >>> Regarding the code issue you submitted, if you have the users cached
> >>> locally, you could use the social graph methods to determine the
> >>> missing/new 2k users pretty quickly using the social graph methods and
> >>> comparing ids.
>
> >>> -Chad
>
> >>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Tim Haines <tmhai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> > Hi Chad,
>
> >>> > Statuses/followers.
>
> >>> > I've just timed another attempt - it took 25 minutes to retrieve 17957
> >>> > followers with statuses/followers.
>
> >>> > Is there anything I can elaborate on in the filed issue to make it
> >>> > clearer?
>
> >>> > Tim.
>
> >>> > On Oct 15, 2:42 pm, Chad Etzel <c...@twitter.com> wrote:
> >>> >> Hi Tim,
>
> >>> >> You said "Retrieving 7000 followers just took > 20 minutes for me."
> >>> >> Can you explain what you meant by that?
>
> >>> >> Are you using the friends/ids, followers/ids methods or the
> >>> >> statuses/friends, statuses/followers methods?
>
> >>> >> -Chad
>
> >>> >> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Tim Haines <tmhai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> >> > Hi'ya,
>
> >>> >> > I'm migrating my code to use cursors at the moment.  It's frustrating
> >>> >> > that calls need to be synchronous rather than how paged calls could 
> >>> >> > be
> >>> >> > asynchronous.  Retrieving 7000 followers just took > 20 minutes for
> >>> >> > me.
>
> >>> >> > I filed an issue that proposes a solution here:
> >>> >> >http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/detail?id=1078 If you
> >>> >> > retrieve friends or followers, please take a look and give it a star
> >>> >> > if it's important to you.
>
> >>> >> > If anyone can suggest a work around for this, I'd be happy to hear 
> >>> >> > it.
>
> >>> >> > Cheers,
>
> >>> >> > Tim.
>
> > --
> > Josh

Reply via email to