Hi All,

While it's not complete unreachability like yesterday morning, I'm again
experiencing, let's call it spotty reachability this morning... Requests
time out or are really slow to complete... Anyone else seeing this?

Thanks,

Michael.


On 10/19/09 9:45 AM, "John Kalucki" <jkalu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> Dewald, are you down, getting weird headers, or OK?
> 
> If you can't connect at all, traceroutes are best. If you get weird
> headers, a copy of the header (and your IP address) are best.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> On Oct 18, 7:23 am, Dewald Pretorius <dpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> traceroute to twitter.com (168.143.162.100), 30 hops max, 40 byte
>> packets
>>  1  81.b5.85ae.static.theplanet.com (174.133.181.129)  1.351 ms  1.439
>> ms  1.464 ms
>>  2  et2-5.ibr01.hstntx1.theplanet.com (207.218.223.5)  0.198 ms  0.229
>> ms  0.266 ms
>>  3  et1-3.ibr01.hstntx2.theplanet.com (70.87.253.154)  0.444 ms
>> et3-2.ibr02.hstntx1.theplanet.com (70.87.253.157)
>> 0.224 ms et1-3.ibr01.hstntx2.theplanet.com (70.87.253.154)  0.466 ms
>>  4  et1-3.ibr02.hstntx2.theplanet.com (70.87.253.58)  0.519 ms
>> et1-2.ibr02.hstntx2.theplanet.com (70.87.253.169)  0
>> .454 ms  0.522 ms
>>  5  xe-4-4.r03.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (128.241.1.5)  167.161 ms
>> 167.045 ms  167.206 ms
>>  6  xe-0-1-0.r20.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.228)  1.185 ms
>> 1.164 ms  1.180 ms
>>  7  p64-7-0-2.r20.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.129)  6.424
>> ms  6.331 ms  6.358 ms
>>  8  po-1.r01.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.74)  6.400 ms
>> 6.451 ms  6.489 ms
>>  9  * * *
>> 
>> --------------------------
>> 
>> traceroute to twitter.com (168.143.162.116), 30 hops max, 40 byte
>> packets
>>  1  81.b5.85ae.static.theplanet.com (174.133.181.129)  0.387 ms  0.432
>> ms  0.475 ms
>>  2  et2-5.ibr01.hstntx1.theplanet.com (207.218.223.5)  0.211 ms  0.257
>> ms  0.273 ms
>>  3  et1-3.ibr01.hstntx2.theplanet.com (70.87.253.154)  0.472 ms
>> et3-2.ibr02.hstntx1.theplanet.com (70.87.253.157)
>> 0.221 ms  0.249 ms
>>  4  et1-3.ibr02.hstntx2.theplanet.com (70.87.253.58)  0.404 ms  0.466
>> ms  0.553 ms
>>  5  xe-4-4.r03.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (128.241.1.5)  107.597 ms
>> 107.679 ms  107.742 ms
>>  6  xe-0-1-0.r20.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.228)  1.136 ms
>> 1.114 ms  1.035 ms
>>  7  p64-7-0-2.r20.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.129)  6.293
>> ms  8.708 ms  6.335 ms
>>  8  po-1.r01.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.74)  6.433 ms
>> 6.486 ms  6.535 ms
>>  9  * * *
>> 
>> -----------------------------
>> 
>> traceroute to twitter.com (168.143.162.36), 30 hops max, 40 byte
>> packets
>>  1  81.b5.85ae.static.theplanet.com (174.133.181.129)  0.429 ms  0.515
>> ms  0.567 ms
>>  2  et2-5.ibr02.hstntx1.theplanet.com (207.218.245.5)  8.956 ms  8.986
>> ms  9.024 ms
>>  3  et1-3.ibr02.hstntx2.theplanet.com (70.87.253.58)  0.439 ms  0.493
>> ms  0.546 ms
>>  4  xe-4-4.r03.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (128.241.1.5)  1.156 ms
>> 1.206 ms  1.254 ms
>>  5  xe-0-1-0.r20.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.228)  1.114 ms
>> 1.113 ms  1.131 ms
>>  6  p64-7-0-2.r20.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.129)  6.280
>> ms  6.256 ms  6.717 ms
>>  7  po-1.r01.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.74)  6.377 ms
>> 6.444 ms  6.499 ms
>>  8  * * *
>> 
>> On Oct 18, 11:14 am, John Kalucki <jkalu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I don't see any operational issues from here, but I'm not an
>>> operational guy. At first glance the system looks fine, and the
>>> operational team isn't in response mode. This is puzzling.
>> 
>>> Seems like a connectivity issue upstream from twitter. At lest a few
>>> developers: please send a traceroute to this list. Also, if you aren't
>>> timing out, but rather are getting an HTTP error, send the response
>>> headers. After say 4 or 5 responses, they'll probably have enough info
>>> to triage this.
>> 
>>> -John Kaluckihttp://twitter.com/jkalucki
>>> Services, Twitter Inc.
>> 
>>> On Oct 18, 6:40 am, Dewald Pretorius <dpr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>> Does anyone else have problems connecting to the API at the moment
>>>> (Sunday morning October 18)?
>> 
>>>> Dewald


Reply via email to