I'm also experiencing that today. It started to get slow several days ago, but today is worse.
Regards, Arnaldo On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Dewald Pretorius <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've also been seeing intermittent connection refuses and really very > slow performance at times today. > > Dewald > > On Oct 19, 3:13 pm, Michael Steuer <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > While it's not complete unreachability like yesterday morning, I'm again > > experiencing, let's call it spotty reachability this morning... Requests > > time out or are really slow to complete... Anyone else seeing this? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Michael. > > > > On 10/19/09 9:45 AM, "John Kalucki" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dewald, are you down, getting weird headers, or OK? > > > > > If you can't connect at all, traceroutes are best. If you get weird > > > headers, a copy of the header (and your IP address) are best. > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > On Oct 18, 7:23 am, Dewald Pretorius <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> traceroute to twitter.com (168.143.162.100), 30 hops max, 40 byte > > >> packets > > >> 1 81.b5.85ae.static.theplanet.com (174.133.181.129) 1.351 ms > 1.439 > > >> ms 1.464 ms > > >> 2 et2-5.ibr01.hstntx1.theplanet.com (207.218.223.5) 0.198 ms > 0.229 > > >> ms 0.266 ms > > >> 3 et1-3.ibr01.hstntx2.theplanet.com (70.87.253.154) 0.444 ms > > >> et3-2.ibr02.hstntx1.theplanet.com (70.87.253.157) > > >> 0.224 ms et1-3.ibr01.hstntx2.theplanet.com (70.87.253.154) 0.466 ms > > >> 4 et1-3.ibr02.hstntx2.theplanet.com (70.87.253.58) 0.519 ms > > >> et1-2.ibr02.hstntx2.theplanet.com (70.87.253.169) 0 > > >> .454 ms 0.522 ms > > >> 5 xe-4-4.r03.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (128.241.1.5) 167.161 ms > > >> 167.045 ms 167.206 ms > > >> 6 xe-0-1-0.r20.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.228) 1.185 ms > > >> 1.164 ms 1.180 ms > > >> 7 p64-7-0-2.r20.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.129) 6.424 > > >> ms 6.331 ms 6.358 ms > > >> 8 po-1.r01.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.74) 6.400 ms > > >> 6.451 ms 6.489 ms > > >> 9 * * * > > > > >> -------------------------- > > > > >> traceroute to twitter.com (168.143.162.116), 30 hops max, 40 byte > > >> packets > > >> 1 81.b5.85ae.static.theplanet.com (174.133.181.129) 0.387 ms > 0.432 > > >> ms 0.475 ms > > >> 2 et2-5.ibr01.hstntx1.theplanet.com (207.218.223.5) 0.211 ms > 0.257 > > >> ms 0.273 ms > > >> 3 et1-3.ibr01.hstntx2.theplanet.com (70.87.253.154) 0.472 ms > > >> et3-2.ibr02.hstntx1.theplanet.com (70.87.253.157) > > >> 0.221 ms 0.249 ms > > >> 4 et1-3.ibr02.hstntx2.theplanet.com (70.87.253.58) 0.404 ms 0.466 > > >> ms 0.553 ms > > >> 5 xe-4-4.r03.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (128.241.1.5) 107.597 ms > > >> 107.679 ms 107.742 ms > > >> 6 xe-0-1-0.r20.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.228) 1.136 ms > > >> 1.114 ms 1.035 ms > > >> 7 p64-7-0-2.r20.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.129) 6.293 > > >> ms 8.708 ms 6.335 ms > > >> 8 po-1.r01.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.74) 6.433 ms > > >> 6.486 ms 6.535 ms > > >> 9 * * * > > > > >> ----------------------------- > > > > >> traceroute to twitter.com (168.143.162.36), 30 hops max, 40 byte > > >> packets > > >> 1 81.b5.85ae.static.theplanet.com (174.133.181.129) 0.429 ms > 0.515 > > >> ms 0.567 ms > > >> 2 et2-5.ibr02.hstntx1.theplanet.com (207.218.245.5) 8.956 ms > 8.986 > > >> ms 9.024 ms > > >> 3 et1-3.ibr02.hstntx2.theplanet.com (70.87.253.58) 0.439 ms 0.493 > > >> ms 0.546 ms > > >> 4 xe-4-4.r03.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (128.241.1.5) 1.156 ms > > >> 1.206 ms 1.254 ms > > >> 5 xe-0-1-0.r20.hstntx01.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.228) 1.114 ms > > >> 1.113 ms 1.131 ms > > >> 6 p64-7-0-2.r20.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.129) 6.280 > > >> ms 6.256 ms 6.717 ms > > >> 7 po-1.r01.dllstx09.us.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.3.74) 6.377 ms > > >> 6.444 ms 6.499 ms > > >> 8 * * * > > > > >> On Oct 18, 11:14 am, John Kalucki <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>> I don't see any operational issues from here, but I'm not an > > >>> operational guy. At first glance the system looks fine, and the > > >>> operational team isn't in response mode. This is puzzling. > > > > >>> Seems like a connectivity issue upstream from twitter. At lest a few > > >>> developers: please send a traceroute to this list. Also, if you > aren't > > >>> timing out, but rather are getting an HTTP error, send the response > > >>> headers. After say 4 or 5 responses, they'll probably have enough > info > > >>> to triage this. > > > > >>> -John Kaluckihttp://twitter.com/jkalucki > > >>> Services, Twitter Inc. > > > > >>> On Oct 18, 6:40 am, Dewald Pretorius <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >>>> Does anyone else have problems connecting to the API at the moment > > >>>> (Sunday morning October 18)? > > > > >>>> Dewald > -- Arnaldo M Pereira
