precisely. no offense intended. i was just amused. (and, if you knew me better, you would realise that i thought a oauth enabled text only client is quite rad).
>> > i wouldn't qualify a text-only client as a desktop client :P >> >> Funny, the 800 people who are using my OAuth-enabled text-only client >> seem to think it works just fine. Just because -you- don't like it >> doesn't mean it doesn't count. > > I don't think that's what Raffi meant. I understood it to mean that a > text-only client isn't a typical desktop environment, which I agree with > (hence my interest in the browserless API). > > -- > ------------------------------------ personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ > -- > Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com > -- To describe bitter medicine will not improve its flavor. -- Charlie Chan > --- > -- Raffi Krikorian Twitter Platform Team http://twitter.com/raffi
