On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Raffi Krikorian <ra...@twitter.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Cameron Kaiser <spec...@floodgap.com> wrote: >>> there will be much more information about this soon. in general, the >>> API for browser-less apps is designed for applications or environments >>> that are unable to bring up a web browser -- desktop clients, >>> presumably, can still bring up a web page? >> >> What about text-only client such as TTYtter or the myriad of automatic >> systems? Unless you make the OAuth page accessible over Lynx, which >> would be cool, but I doubt. :) > > i wouldn't qualify a text-only client as a desktop client :P > > more detail will be coming - but, in general, i would ask developers > to think about privacy from their users' standpoint :P
I've got a number of shell scripts that I run via 'curl --netrc' with my password stored in ~/.netrc How will OAuth work with this scenario? I don't need anyone else's password, just my own.
