Good observation and reasonable assumption.
However, there is a thin possibility that these are being assigned from
different sub-spaces within the same address space.
I am still hoping it is the case since it will simplify my DB design much.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Michael Steuer <mste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know for sure but as tweet id's are sequential and the current dm
> id counter is way lower than the current tweet id, I would assume they're
> separate sets...
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 13, 2009, at 10:25 PM, Harshad RJ <harshad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Are the DM ids unique within {DMs + Tweets} set or only in the {DM} set?
>
> In other words, if I am storing a collection of DMs and Tweets in a DB, can
> I index it safely using DM.id and Tweet.id ?
>
> thanks,
> --
> Harshad RJ
> <http://hrj.wikidot.com>http://hrj.wikidot.com
>
>
--
Harshad RJ
http://hrj.wikidot.com
