They're separate ID spaces.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Harshad RJ <harshad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good observation and reasonable assumption.
>
> However, there is a thin possibility that these are being assigned from
> different sub-spaces within the same address space.
>
> I am still hoping it is the case since it will simplify my DB design much.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Michael Steuer <mste...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't know for sure but as tweet id's are sequential and the current dm
>> id counter is way lower than the current tweet id, I would assume they're
>> separate sets...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 13, 2009, at 10:25 PM, Harshad RJ <harshad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Are the DM ids unique within {DMs + Tweets} set or only in the {DM} set?
>>
>> In other words, if I am storing a collection of DMs and Tweets in a DB,
>> can I index it safely using DM.id and Tweet.id ?
>>
>> thanks,
>> --
>> Harshad RJ
>> <http://hrj.wikidot.com>http://hrj.wikidot.com
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Harshad RJ
> http://hrj.wikidot.com
>
--
Raffi Krikorian
Twitter Platform Team
http://twitter.com/raffi
