I've filed a bug to get the documentation updated.

It could be phrased better as 20k per user per whitelisted IP.

If you have N users on a whitelisted IP you should have N * 20k
authenticated request every hour.

Abraham

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 23:52, vikas <cvika...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> The document says "Each whitelisted entity, whether an account or IP
> address, is allowed 20000 requests per hour. ",
> in one of the twitter-development-talk i found this,  "What you all
> have been confirming is correct. The intended behavior is 20k per IP
> unauthenticated, and 20k per IP *per user* authenticated. This is not
> a bug. ",
> what does "20k per IP Per User" means ?
>
> If N number of users are using my application which communicates with
> Twitter over a whitelisted IP, then in total, how many GET-requests-
> credit my application will get from Twitter per hour for authenticated
> based requists?
>
>
> On Dec 15, 9:12 pm, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here is Twitter's documentation on rate limiting:
> http://apiwiki.twitter.com/Rate-limiting
> >
> > Abraham
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:21, vikas <cvika...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I went through the group lists searching for a clear understanding of
> > > API rate limit, but unfortunately could not able to get a clear idea.
> > > There are already many discussions about this but i am asking this
> > > again as i need this information to develop my product.
> >
> > > I have few simple questions, the answers to which will solve my
> > > problem, any one please help,
> >
> > > does the limit applies to IP only?
> > > ex, if N number of users are requesting through a whitelisted IP, then
> > > only IP's limit count is decreased and the individual users count is
> > > not changed
> >
> > > or is it ip and also user based ?
> > > ex, if my IP is whitelisted, then for 20,000 users i will get 20k *
> > > 20k requests credit per hour.
> >
> > > Please explain the exact way the rate limit is working........
> >
> > > thanks and regards,
> > > Vikas
> >
> > --
> > Abraham Williams | Awesome Lists |http://bit.ly/sprout608
> > Project | Intersect |http://intersect.labs.poseurtech.com
> > Hacker |http://abrah.am|http://twitter.com/abraham
> > This email is: [ ] shareable [x] ask first [ ] private.
> > Sent from Madison, WI, United States
>



-- 
Abraham Williams | Awesome Lists | http://bit.ly/sprout608
Project | Intersect | http://intersect.labs.poseurtech.com
Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham
This email is: [ ] shareable [x] ask first [ ] private.
Sent from Madison, WI, United States

Reply via email to