Also ensure that your client is logging the raw data as received from the socket. Sometimes this will narrows an issue down to a parsing or similar error in the client.
-John Kalucki http://twitter.com/jkalucki Infrastructure, Twitter Inc. On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Mark McBride <mmcbr...@twitter.com> wrote: > If you can duplicate this, can you send the exact text, tweet IDs and times > of the runs? Latency on the streaming API should be better than it is in > search (they're both pretty fast), so having the streaming API lag search is > surprising. > > ---Mark > > http://twitter.com/mccv > > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Mad Euchre <mad.ukrain...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I wanted to test if my program is getting all the tweets it should. My >> simple test was track="Palin" and I timed it for exactly 5 minutes. I >> got 3 tweets and several replies to. Then I immediately ran this: >> http://search.twitter.com/search.atom?q=Palin >> and looked for tweets in the last 5 minutes. >> >> There were 7 results for the last 5 minutes. The 3 I got from the >> stream matched the oldest of the 7, so there were 4 newer that the >> steam didn't pick up. >> >> I don't mind if there is a slight delay and the missing 4 would >> eventually show up. How else can I tell if I'm getting all the tweets >> that I'm supposed to from the stream? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Peter >> >> >> -- >> Subscription settings: >> http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/subscribe?hl=en >> > >
