Ya. I was surprised when that change was made. Abraham
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 23:04, Andy Freeman <ana...@earthlink.net> wrote: > While I may not want to revoke access for a key, I don't want to leave > folks logged into twitter if they use my application from a shared > computer. (And no, asking them to log out from twitter isn't > reasonable.) > > It used to be that oauth/authorize did NOT leave users logged into > twitter, now it does. > > http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/detail?id=1453 > > > > On Apr 20, 6:36 pm, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There is no oauth/revoke method. Personally I don't see much utility in > one > > except for keeping /settings/connections less cluttered. > > > > Abraham > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 18:15, Robbie Coleman <rob...@gravity.com> > wrote: > > > I do not see it documented, and dev.twitter.com/doc is throwing 403's > on > > > searches, but I do see that your own " > > >http://twitter.com/settings/connections"; "Revoke Access" links call > this > > > on the click event. > > > > > I am trying to provide our users a clean UI for managing all of their > OAuth > > > enabled networks/sites, and twitter is one of those. Both Facebook and > > > Google (their OAuth contact API) provide API calls to revoke a user's > > > access_token/session_key. > > > > > Thanks, > > > Robbie Coleman > > > Software Cleric & Social Shaman > > > Gravity > > > > -- > > Abraham Williams | Developer for hire |http://abrah.am > > PoseurTech Labs | Projects |http://labs.poseurtech.com > > This email is: [ ] shareable [x] ask first [ ] private. > > > > -- > > Subscription settings: > http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/subscribe?hl=en-Hide > quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > -- Abraham Williams | Developer for hire | http://abrah.am PoseurTech Labs | Projects | http://labs.poseurtech.com This email is: [ ] shareable [x] ask first [ ] private.
