Taylor,

Confirmed. I just upgraded read only tokens and was able
to successfully send a DM.

Thank you for finally allowing read only access tokens to be upgraded to
read and write access tokens. This issue has been plaguing developers for
almost a year now. Both forcing applications to ask for permission they
didn't need if there was even a remote possibility they might want write
permissions in the future and biting devs in the ass if they unknowingly
built up a customer base of read only tokens.

I hope we will continue to see fixes coming down the pipe to keep Twitter
API a viable platform for further development.

Thank you again,
Abraham
-------------
Abraham Williams | Hacker Advocate | abrah.am
@abraham <https://twitter.com/abraham> | github.com/abraham | blog.abrah.am
This email is: [ ] shareable [x] ask first [ ] private.



On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:19, Taylor Singletary <
taylorsinglet...@twitter.com> wrote:

> You'll have to re-ask your users for permission for write mode and you
> won't have any way via the API to track who is ready to read/write yet --
> you'll want to manage the conversion process yourself and track whether
> you've converted your users yet or not.
>
> The thinking behind this is that when your users authorized your app, they
> only authorized it for read-access. Wanting write access requires a new
> agreement with the user.
>
> The oauth/authorize step should now upgrade to read/write from read-only
> tokens when the user is re-challenged.
>
> Taylor
>
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Adam Green <140...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> So if a user authorizes an app for read access, the app can switch to
>> read/write at any time without asking the users permission? Is this
>> true? Anyone from Twitter have any input on this?
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Patrick Kennedy <kenned...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Tim -
>> >
>> > 1.  Changing from read to read/write won't change you API consumer
>> > keys or tokens.
>> >
>> > 2.  Your application's users don't authorized for read or read/write;
>> > they merely use your application, which you offer as read or
>> > read/write to the world.  That is to say, if it's read, your
>> > application can only read its tweets, and if read/write, it can both
>> > read its own tweet and post to the world.
>> >
>> > I'd say go ahead and switch to read/write, given the fact that you now
>> > want that functionality.
>> >
>> > ~Patrick
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Tim Bull <tim.b...@binaryplex.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> We must be about the only developers in the universe that requested
>> >> users grant only read access when we first got people to connect
>> >> http://trunk.ly to Twitter (I think of the 40 or so apps authorized on
>> >> my account, Trunk.ly is the only one that asks for Read only).  Never
>> >> ask for more access than you need is my philosophy.
>> >>
>> >> Doh!
>> >>
>> >> Of course now, we want to add some Tweet out functions which require
>> >> users grant us Write access.
>> >>
>> >> A couple of questions for the Twitter people.
>> >>
>> >> 1. If we change the access in the application from read to read/write
>> >> does this reset the API key, or will it stay the same (hoping it stays
>> >> the same).
>> >> 2. How can I work out if existing users have authorised us for read/
>> >> write?  I looked at
>> http://developer.twitter.com/doc/get/account/verify_credentials
>> >> but it doesn't show me what access they have.  Do I have to write,
>> >> fail, force them to step through OAuth then post? Or is there a way of
>> >> knowing before hand it will fail and asking them to upgrade?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> Tim
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Twitter developer documentation and resources:
>> http://dev.twitter.com/doc
>> >> API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
>> >> Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
>> http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
>> >> Change your membership to this group:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Twitter developer documentation and resources:
>> http://dev.twitter.com/doc
>> > API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
>> > Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
>> http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
>> > Change your membership to this group:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adam Green
>> Twitter API Consultant and Trainer
>> http://140dev.com
>> @140dev
>>
>> --
>> Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
>> API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
>> Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
>> http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
>> Change your membership to this group:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk
>>
>
>  --
> Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
> API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
> Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
> http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
> Change your membership to this group:
> http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk
>

-- 
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk

Reply via email to