The way I read Abraham's note, he's saying that by simply upgrading
the token from read to read/write he was able to write?  I didn't take
it to mean he had also sent the user to reauthorise?

T

On Feb 1, 8:46 am, Tom van der Woerdt <i...@tvdw.eu> wrote:
> Actually, since the user needs to re-authorize the application, I do not
> think that this is a bug.
>
> Tom
>
> On 1/31/11 10:45 PM, Tim Bull wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > While this makes me happy (from a developers point of view), surely
> > this is a bug and therefore not to be relied on?
>
> > As a user, I agree with the logic that if I authorised Read only, the
> > application shouldn't be able to turn this into Read/Write without
> > some subsequent approval.
>
> > Tim
>
> > On Jan 31, 1:46 pm, Abraham Williams<4bra...@gmail.com>  wrote:
> >> Taylor,
>
> >> Confirmed. I just upgraded read only tokens and was able
> >> to successfully send a DM.
>
> >> Thank you for finally allowing read only access tokens to be upgraded to
> >> read and write access tokens. This issue has been plaguing developers for
> >> almost a year now. Both forcing applications to ask for permission they
> >> didn't need if there was even a remote possibility they might want write
> >> permissions in the future and biting devs in the ass if they unknowingly
> >> built up a customer base of read only tokens.
>
> >> I hope we will continue to see fixes coming down the pipe to keep Twitter
> >> API a viable platform for further development.
>
> >> Thank you again,
> >> Abraham
> >> -------------
> >> Abraham Williams | Hacker Advocate | abrah.am
> >> @abraham<https://twitter.com/abraham>  | github.com/abraham | blog.abrah.am
> >> This email is: [ ] shareable [x] ask first [ ] private.
>
> >> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:19, Taylor Singletary<
>
> >> taylorsinglet...@twitter.com>  wrote:
> >>> You'll have to re-ask your users for permission for write mode and you
> >>> won't have any way via the API to track who is ready to read/write yet --
> >>> you'll want to manage the conversion process yourself and track whether
> >>> you've converted your users yet or not.
>
> >>> The thinking behind this is that when your users authorized your app, they
> >>> only authorized it for read-access. Wanting write access requires a new
> >>> agreement with the user.
>
> >>> The oauth/authorize step should now upgrade to read/write from read-only
> >>> tokens when the user is re-challenged.
>
> >>> Taylor
>
> >>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Adam Green<140...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> >>>> So if a user authorizes an app for read access, the app can switch to
> >>>> read/write at any time without asking the users permission? Is this
> >>>> true? Anyone from Twitter have any input on this?
>
> >>>> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Patrick Kennedy<kenned...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> Tim -
>
> >>>>> 1.  Changing from read to read/write won't change you API consumer
> >>>>> keys or tokens.
>
> >>>>> 2.  Your application's users don't authorized for read or read/write;
> >>>>> they merely use your application, which you offer as read or
> >>>>> read/write to the world.  That is to say, if it's read, your
> >>>>> application can only read its tweets, and if read/write, it can both
> >>>>> read its own tweet and post to the world.
>
> >>>>> I'd say go ahead and switch to read/write, given the fact that you now
> >>>>> want that functionality.
>
> >>>>> ~Patrick
>
> >>>>> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Tim Bull<tim.b...@binaryplex.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> We must be about the only developers in the universe that requested
> >>>>>> users grant only read access when we first got people to connect
> >>>>>>http://trunk.lytoTwitter (I think of the 40 or so apps authorized on
> >>>>>> my account, Trunk.ly is the only one that asks for Read only).  Never
> >>>>>> ask for more access than you need is my philosophy.
>
> >>>>>> Doh!
>
> >>>>>> Of course now, we want to add some Tweet out functions which require
> >>>>>> users grant us Write access.
>
> >>>>>> A couple of questions for the Twitter people.
>
> >>>>>> 1. If we change the access in the application from read to read/write
> >>>>>> does this reset the API key, or will it stay the same (hoping it stays
> >>>>>> the same).
> >>>>>> 2. How can I work out if existing users have authorised us for read/
> >>>>>> write?  I looked at
> >>>>http://developer.twitter.com/doc/get/account/verify_credentials
> >>>>>> but it doesn't show me what access they have.  Do I have to write,
> >>>>>> fail, force them to step through OAuth then post? Or is there a way of
> >>>>>> knowing before hand it will fail and asking them to upgrade?
>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
>
> >>>>>> Tim
>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Twitter developer documentation and resources:
> >>>>http://dev.twitter.com/doc
> >>>>>> API updates via Twitter:http://twitter.com/twitterapi
> >>>>>> Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
> >>>>http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
> >>>>>> Change your membership to this group:
> >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk
>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Twitter developer documentation and resources:
> >>>>http://dev.twitter.com/doc
> >>>>> API updates via Twitter:http://twitter.com/twitterapi
> >>>>> Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
> >>>>http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
> >>>>> Change your membership to this group:
> >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Adam Green
> >>>> Twitter API Consultant and Trainer
> >>>>http://140dev.com
> >>>> @140dev
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Twitter developer documentation and resources:http://dev.twitter.com/doc
> >>>> API updates via Twitter:http://twitter.com/twitterapi
> >>>> Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
> >>>>http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
> >>>> Change your membership to this group:
> >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk
>
> >>>   --
> >>> Twitter developer documentation and resources:http://dev.twitter.com/doc
> >>> API updates via Twitter:http://twitter.com/twitterapi
> >>> Issues/Enhancements Tracker:
> >>>http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
> >>> Change your membership to this group:
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk

-- 
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk

Reply via email to