Good to hear. I look forward to when I have the time / resources to
start working with it. Thanks.

On Jul 6, 7:47 pm, Mark Krieger <markskrie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We are doing this in a VERY controlled way, where the switch from REST
> API to Site Streams (and back) is very simple as needed in our
> application. Also, the users who get Site Streams are VERY few, and
> are aware of it. So far, so good, we are doing very well with it. It
> has been up for many days, no interruptions. Happy happy.
>
> Mark
>
> On Jul 6, 1:39 am, Orian Marx <or...@orianmarx.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Mark, this is a great post, thanks for taking the time to write it up.
> > What I'm curious about is that I believe Site Streams is still in beta
> > and not supposed to be used in a production environment according to
> > Twitter. Has it been stable for you?
>
> > On Jun 28, 12:24 pm, Mark Krieger <markskrie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > We've gone live with Site Streams for paying customers of our
> > > TweetRoost product. I wrote a blog with technical details which some
> > > people might find interesting. See it 
> > > athttp://www.mediaroost.com/2011/06/tweetroost-goes-live-with-twitter-s...
> > > -- it is not a product blog or a pitch :) (and I am a big fan of Site
> > > Streams, it was a great project for us to implement)
>
> > > Mark Krieger
> > > President
> > > @mediaroost

-- 
Twitter developer documentation and resources: https://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: https://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: https://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/twitter-development-talk

Reply via email to