Dod wrote: > Hello Arno, > > I could but...don't remember where is my stop-time watch I just bought > around the corner to make it pause life-time for next 10 years :-)
However, most high level components would benefit from such a buffered stream, highly efficient, and don't forget "I am programming, therefore I exist" ;-) > AG> Dod wrote: >>> Also remember that if you use xDSL connection your upload bandwidth >>> much smaller than download one. > > AG> Yes I know, I was just wondering whether file caching can make such a > big AG> difference. > > AG> BTW: I already suggested last year to write/implement a tiny buffered > stream AG> class, that would boost performance in most high level ICS > components. AG> I'm actually busy with another ICS work, if somebody has > some time and wants AG> to enter the Hall Of Fame...;-) > > >>> >>>>> Is GET faster than PUT? >>>>> In my tests GET performs seven times faster than PUT. >>> >>> FP> Considering the transport, there is no reason to have a speed >>> difference. >>> >>>>> Server caches files, is that the reason? >>> >>> FP> That helps have high performance. >>> FP> -- >>> FP> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> FP> http://www.overbyte.be -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://www.elists.org/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
