Paul wrote: >> What's the actual problem? From a brief look the article above seems >> to describe hole punching very well, guess you just have to >> implement it accordingly (also known as work ;). > > (also known as work ;). > Yes, but I don't like to work :) > > No, seriously, I've never had the time to dive into socket > programming and still struggling to find the time for it. > So, I need to get as much info I can before I even can start with it > ... > > It's obvious that a central server has to be used to exchange > connection/NAT data to both peers,
Fore sure it is, and also to be able to fall back to simple relaying. > but there are many articles to > find on the net and many are contradictable Hard to believe that P2P worked without rendezvous server. -- Arno -- To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
