On Sunday 16 April 2006 01:42, mathew wrote: > On Apr 14, 2006, at 23:49 , Piers Cawley wrote: > > mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Anyhow, I think it's pretty funny to be rejecting code based on > >> lack of > >> tests, when there's an almost complete lack of documentation. > > > > Huh? Join the non sequitur club, we may not make sense but we do like > > pizza! > > Documentation is as essential to good software as tests.
Actually, it's probably more essential, because without documentation telling
you how things are supposed to work, there's no way to write new tests. ;-)
TX
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web site: http://trypticon.org/
GPG Fingerprint: 9EEB 97D7 8F7B 7977 F39F A62C B8C7 BC8B 037E EA73
pgpao3t8hMs0s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Typo-list mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
