On Apr 15, 2006, at 8:01 PM, Trejkaz wrote: > On Sunday 16 April 2006 01:42, mathew wrote: >> On Apr 14, 2006, at 23:49 , Piers Cawley wrote: >>> mathew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>> Anyhow, I think it's pretty funny to be rejecting code based on >>>> lack of >>>> tests, when there's an almost complete lack of documentation. >>> >>> Huh? Join the non sequitur club, we may not make sense but we do >>> like >>> pizza! >> >> Documentation is as essential to good software as tests. > > Actually, it's probably more essential, because without > documentation telling > you how things are supposed to work, there's no way to write new > tests. ;-)
Unless you have convinced yourself that you don't need documentation because your code is so readable and you have lots of tests that show what your code is supposed to do. I don't buy it though. -- Josh Susser http://blog.hasmanythrough.com _______________________________________________ Typo-list mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/typo-list
