Am Mon, 08 Oct 2012 10:34:20 +0200 schrieb Martin Bless: > Hi all, > > I'm not interested in what happened when why and how in the past. I'm > only interested in TYPO3 being successful. In this post I'm > concentrating on the color change of the logo. > > Short and concise: > ================== > I watched the keynote of the T3CON. The reason(ing) I heard was: "We > want to simplify things for you. It's cheaper to print the logo on > t-shirts and so on with just one color. People would say TYPO3 is > 'orange'". Did I miss an argument? > > Here's what I think: We have a strong brand TYPO3 with a clear logo > since years. It is "orange and green". You would only touch ANYTHING of > a well established visual symbol (shape, color, Freiraum, ...) if you > really have GOOD reasons. The reasons given above are not *good* reasons > in that sense. > > So, in short: I strongly urge everybody to put the green back into the > logo! >
now I remembered the orange. it might be a little bit different. but on first sight it is te same (who can see the exact RGB-values without direct compare?) TYPO3 has become a kid toy: there is a big TV channel for kids which used orange since years for their logo: nickelodeon whoever wants to associate TYPO3 with nickelodeon should use the pure orange. is TYPO3 a kid toy or a serious ECMS? bernd -- http://www.pi-phi.de/cheatsheet.html _______________________________________________ TYPO3-english mailing list TYPO3-english@lists.typo3.org http://lists.typo3.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/typo3-english
