On 2025-08-24 22:37, Peter Krefting via tz wrote:
<q>Prague</q>, <q>Praha</q>, <q>Прага</q>, and <q>布拉格</q>.
Thanks, I had not considered that, and perhaps we should use <q> for
ordinary double-quoting in English. However, <q> does not address text
like this:
Astrodienst’s Web version of Shanks and Pottenger’s
which is not as nice as:
Astrodienst’s Web version of Shanks and Pottenger’s
Also, <https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#the-q-element> says that <q> is not
always a substitute for ordinary double-quoting. For example, in:
They are not in any sense “standard compatible” – some are
using <q> would be incorrect as this does not quote another source.
So even if we use <q> there are places where we will still need curved
quotes in the HTML.
For more about issues with <q>, please see:
https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/10216