On Monday 28 January 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:00:34 -0500
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > uint8_t spiflash_exchange_byte(uint8_t transmit)
>
> Uh. Did you just propose SPI framework #6 for u-boot?
>
> How about we try to modify one of the existing ones so that it can be
> useful for everything? That is, spi flash, spi eeproms, LCD panels,
> sensors, etc.?
>
> In fact, I did post a patch that attempted this not so long ago, but I
> never got any response:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/33822/focus=33821
>
> I'd really like to see a common layer for SPI flash though, so I don't
> mean to criticise your effort. But it would be nice if not every new
> SPI client came with its own low-level SPI functions...

i know exactly where you're coming from, so dont sweat it.  my purpose was to 
get things integrated and then take a look at the existing pieces and unify 
them.  easier i think to have known working code to throw at a common 
framework than code for hypothetical uses we cant actually break our teeth 
on.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to