On Tuesday 29 January 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'd really like to see a common layer for SPI flash though, so I don't > > > mean to criticise your effort. But it would be nice if not every new > > > SPI client came with its own low-level SPI functions... > > > > i know exactly where you're coming from, so dont sweat it. my purpose > > was to get things integrated and then take a look at the existing pieces > > and unify them. easier i think to have known working code to throw at a > > common framework than code for hypothetical uses we cant actually break > > our teeth on. > > Ok, don't worry about it then. I just wanted to make sure you > investigate the API(s) we already have before you propose something > new. > > So let's just make "please use the include/spi.h API for low-level SPI > access" be one of the comments on your RFC :-)
do you have a git tree for this so i can pull it down and test it for Blackfin ? i can see about posting an updated implementation then ... -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
