In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > I proposed this patch for a long time, but it was rejected by Wolfgang.
>
> One solution to that problem is to have someone who maintains a separate
> tree for uboot which does have the feature in. Then it becomes a matter
> of community choice whether they use the official tree or the tree with
> sensible machine-id configurability.
>
> That way, those who want the configurability can have it, and Wolfgang can
> avoid having his tree polluted with useful features he doesn't want.
Russel, are you by chance volunteering to become the custodian for
the ARM related parts of U-Boot? Just let me know...
BTW: do you actually know what you are commenting about? Did you look
up Ulf's proposal and the reject message in the U-Boot mailing list
archive?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out,
which is the exact opposite.
-- Bertrand Russell, "Skeptical Essays", 1928
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
