On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 01:05:44AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > > I proposed this patch for a long time, but it was rejected by Wolfgang. > > > > One solution to that problem is to have someone who maintains a separate > > tree for uboot which does have the feature in. Then it becomes a matter > > of community choice whether they use the official tree or the tree with > > sensible machine-id configurability. > > > > That way, those who want the configurability can have it, and Wolfgang can > > avoid having his tree polluted with useful features he doesn't want. > > Russel, are you by chance volunteering to become the custodian for > the ARM related parts of U-Boot? Just let me know...
Wulfgage, no I am not. > BTW: do you actually know what you are commenting about? Did you look > up Ulf's proposal and the reject message in the U-Boot mailing list > archive? Duh. I think everyone knows the answer to those questions who've seen my past comments on this subject - and it's plainly obvious what the answer to the second question is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
