> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 March 2008 16:22 > To: Peter Pearse > Cc: U-Boot-Users > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [ARM] Move ARM supplied > dev boards to new board/armltd directory > > In message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > This patch will allow code common to all ARM supplied development > > boards to be shared. > ... > > > - @board/integratorap/split_by_variant.sh $@ > > + @board/armltd/integratorap/split_by_variant.sh $@ > > I really dislike the "armltd" name. Is there any specific > reason for not just using "arm" here?
I thought that would be too confusing with the architecture name. All the boards with ARM architecture cores are arm boards in that sense. This is a board sub-directory for the ARM Ltd supplied development boards i.e. VENDOR=armltd. I really dont mind what it's called, or whether it has the word arm in it. How about vendor001 to allow other vendor sub-directories, whatever their architecture? Regards Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
