In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > > > - @board/integratorap/split_by_variant.sh $@ > > > + @board/armltd/integratorap/split_by_variant.sh $@ > > > > I really dislike the "armltd" name. Is there any specific > > reason for not just using "arm" here? > > I thought that would be too confusing with the architecture name. > All the boards with ARM architecture cores are arm boards in that sense.
The convention is that names in board/ are vendor names, not architectures, so board/arm/ should be clear enough. > This is a board sub-directory for the ARM Ltd supplied development boards > i.e. VENDOR=armltd. Yes, I understood your intention, btu armltd is ugly and nobody else uses it. > I really dont mind what it's called, or whether it has the word arm in it. Let's call it arm, please. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
