On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 10:32, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Um... that would fix this specific situation - but we might still run > into the same problem with the next attempt to convert code to the > new config style.
Yeah, we just need to pick 'em off one-by-one... :-) > For example, there might be code which might be compiled depending on > CONFIG_PREBOOT. Ah, as I understand that one, I think it gets solved in a slightly different manner. The kernel introduces a "HAS" variant that indicates if the feature is enabled and then uses something like CONFIG_HAS_PREBOOT to indicate and test for its presence. The actual _value_ remains the CONFIG_PREBOOT symbol. jdl ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
