In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > Ah, as I understand that one, I think it gets solved in > a slightly different manner. The kernel introduces a "HAS" > variant that indicates if the feature is enabled and > then uses something like CONFIG_HAS_PREBOOT to indicate > and test for its presence. The actual _value_ remains > the CONFIG_PREBOOT symbol.
Then we should do the same for autoconfig.mk, and use CONFIG_HAS_POST in the POST Makefile? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Q: What's a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular year. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
