In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > Can we agree on this?
>
> I haven't tried out the CONFIG_FIT stuff yet so some of these concerns
> might not be real issues:
> 1. Are their changes to linux kernel build system to create a
> FIT .uImage ?
Not yet.
> 2. if "#define CONFIG_FIT 1" can we use an "old" style uImage?
Yes, of course.
> If the answer to 2. is no, I'm concerned about boards that are part of
> a family (like Freescale reference boards for PPC) and having two
> different image formats to deal with.
No, I don't intend to force incompatible changes on innocent users :-)
Ideally, nobody has even to take notice of the new feature - unless
they run "help" on some of the commands.
But then, they *can* use the new features if they want.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The first rule of magic is simple. Don't waste your time waving your
hands and hoping when a rock or a club will do."
- McCloctnik the Lucid
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
