On Mar 26, 2008, at 9:57 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>>> Can we agree on this?
>>
>> I haven't tried out the CONFIG_FIT stuff yet so some of these  
>> concerns
>> might not be real issues:
>> 1. Are their changes to linux kernel build system to create a
>> FIT .uImage ?
>
> Not yet.
>
>> 2. if "#define CONFIG_FIT 1" can we use an "old" style uImage?
>
> Yes, of course.
>
>> If the answer to 2. is no, I'm concerned about boards that are part  
>> of
>> a family (like Freescale reference boards for PPC) and having two
>> different image formats to deal with.
>
> No, I don't intend to force incompatible changes on innocent users :-)
>
> Ideally, nobody has even to take notice of the new feature - unless
> they run "help" on some of the commands.
>
> But then, they *can* use the new features if they want.

Than I'm all for.

- k

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to