Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Thursday 27 March 2008, Larry Johnson wrote:
>> Yes, we normally use ECC modules in our testing. I've been looking at a
>> patch for "initdram()" Denali SPD, but I've been waiting to see how your
>> "CFG_MEM_TOP_HIDE" patch would turn out.
>>
>> As things stand now, can I assume that boards using the Denali SPD will
>> also define "CFG_MEM_TOP_HIDE", and therefore initdram() should continue
>> to return the full size of the memory?
>
> Correct.
>
>> The only place that the last 256 bytes of memory are touched is when
>> "dflush()" is called to zero the SDRAM.
>
> To be more specific, in the dcbz_area() call.
>
>> This does not cause a Machine
>> Check interrupt. I am guessing that all the writes from "dflush()" are
>> aligned, and therefore there are no burst that access beyond the end of
>> of the SDRAM memory space. If so, then my inclination is not to change
>> this part of the code. Does this make sense?
>
> I recommend to change it this way:
>
> /* Zero the memory */
> debug("Zeroing SDRAM...");
> - dcbz_area(CFG_SDRAM_BASE, dram_size);
> + dcbz_area(CFG_SDRAM_BASE, dram_size - CFG_MEM_TOP_HIDE);
> dflush();
>
> And perhaps put something like:
>
> #ifndef CFG_MEM_TOP_HIDE
> #error "Please define CFG_MEM_TOP_HIDE (see README) in your board config
> file!"
> #endif
>
> at the top of the file. What do you think?
>
> Best regards,
> Stefan
That sound fine, I'll try to get a patch out soon.
Best regards,
Larry
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
