Timur,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timur Tabi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:40 AM
> To: Menon, Nishanth
> Cc: Sascha Hauer; Laurent Desnogues; Kamat, Nishant; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
> u-boot-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [Patch 0/9] U-boot-V2: Introduce I2C support for 
> SDP3430
>
> Sounds to me like U-Boot V2 is just a repacked Linux kernel.
Lol... not entirely true.. I'd say it is inspired by Linux kernel. In fact lots 
of stuff we have in kernel which are not required in a boot support scenario 
has been pared down.. we don't have multiple schedulers, process et.al. IMHO, 
u-boot v2 is neat, it will need lot of our effort is making it better :). A 
call for more folks to pitch in? ;)

I have a boot loader which does basic stuff and a usable prompt in around 30 
something K. which kind of neat in itself.

>We could probably
> save ourselves a lot of trouble if we just took the DDR and CPU register
> initialization code in U-Boot and moved it to the kernel.

This may not be possible in all configurations. Where possible, platforms can 
choose to do it - yes - I would probably not need to do camera configurations 
in u-boot on my SOC - I will push it off to kernel. I might however need to 
talk i2c to my USB transceiver here to do USBTTY or USBNET. Doing cpu and clock 
inits may not be enough in u-boot in that case.

Regards,
Nishanth Menon

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to