On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:39:30AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > > It does not have i2c support. And IMHO, using kernel like i2c > > addition in U-Boot v2 is appropriate. Why this is not a bloat U-Boot > > v2? > > If it isn't, then it means that U-Boot V2 will be pretty bloated in > general.
Please have a look at the code base first and post *then* instead of speculating. > Sounds to me like U-Boot V2 is just a repacked Linux kernel. We could > probably save ourselves a lot of trouble if we just took the DDR and > CPU register initialization code in U-Boot and moved it to the kernel. It might be a good opportunity to check the code now ... :-) rsc -- Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
