In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > Well, yes - if it's for compiler/assembler options only, then the
> > board config file is not the correct place for this.
> 
> I don't think so because 1) CPU type is not board-dependent, and 2) the
> board config file is not board-specific file, but system config file.
> CPU type is reasonably one of system configuration, IMO.

I cannot follow you here. Especially I have no idea what you mean by
"system config file".

To make sure we use the same terms: THe "board config file" is the
board specific header file "include/configs/<boardname>.h". This file
is definitely NOT the correct place to tweak compiler and/or assembler
options (not to mention that I don't see how this would be done).

I _guess_ you might be referring to the cpu/*/config.mk files, but
then the term "_board_ config file" is wrong.

> P.S. I decided to defer this patch due to some reason. That's another
>      story and will inform the list later.

Since I haven't heard again about this I assume this is for the next
merge window (or even later). Is this assumption correct, or should
this still go into the current release?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Lord: I just want *one* one-armed manager so  I  never  have  to
hear "On the other hand", again.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users

Reply via email to