Hi Magnus and Jens, >> Basically, I agree. But would you accept the current patch for now? The new >> routines and macros later could be implemented later. > > I don't think it's up to me to ACK or NAK this, but I can accept the > current patch.
Yes, this decision is up to the custodian. But lets be honest here, we all know what "we can implement this later" means. We really need to fix problems as they arise. Especially in this case I don't think that it is such a significant effort to fix it now. Fixing it later will only need even more effort. Usually this effort(t-[detection time]) is an exponential function and I am not kidding on this. Cheers Detlev -- Among the -) the .-) is king -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
