Ben Warren wrote: > Uh, yeah. I like the idea of a central repo for hardware info, and > the device tree concept is good. My point is that the syntax, while > concise and exact, can be intimidating. Just look at the amount of > traffic on the mailing lists of people that don't understand what all > the fields mean when specifying IRQs etc. Anything we can do to make > it less so for noobies is a good thing for everybody.
Sure, no argument there -- enhancing the dts syntax with symbolic constants, computational expressions, and macros should make things like interrupt specifiers and maps a lot clearer. -Scott ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ U-Boot-Users mailing list U-Boot-Users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
