On 02/08/2013 09:12:14 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
This enables generic board support so that ppc boards can define
CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
---
Changes in v5: None
Changes in v4: None
Changes in v3: None
Changes in v2: None

 arch/powerpc/config.mk            | 3 ---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/u-boot.h | 7 +++++++
 arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile         | 2 ++
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/config.mk b/arch/powerpc/config.mk
index bf77090..b706281 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/config.mk
+++ b/arch/powerpc/config.mk
@@ -29,9 +29,6 @@ PLATFORM_RELFLAGS += -fpic -mrelocatable -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
 PLATFORM_CPPFLAGS += -DCONFIG_PPC -D__powerpc__
 PLATFORM_LDFLAGS  += -n

-# Move to unified board system later
-CONFIG_SYS_LEGACY_BOARD := y
-
 #
# When cross-compiling on NetBSD, we have to define __PPC__ or else we
 # will pick up a va_list declaration that is incompatible with the
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/u-boot.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/u-boot.h
index 7229a98..951dd6a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/u-boot.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/u-boot.h
@@ -34,6 +34,11 @@
  * include/asm-ppc/u-boot.h
  */

+#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_GENERIC_BOARD
+/* Use the generic board which requires a unified bd_info */
+#include <asm-generic/u-boot.h>
+#else

Note that a unified bd_info means you're breaking compatibility with old, pre-device-tree kernels (including possibly some non-Linux OSes that still don't use the device tree) -- in which case why keep it around at all?

If you meant for the unified bd_info to be backwards compatible, it's missing bi_ip_addr.

-Scott
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to