We intended to clear the bits of CLK_SRC_TOP2 register, instead we were
writing on the reserved bits of src_core1 register. Since the default
value of clk_src_top2 register were itself zero, this typo was not
creating any big issue. But it is better to fix this error for better
readability of the code.

Signed-off-by: Hatim Ali <hatim...@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <aksha...@samsung.com>
---
 board/samsung/smdk5250/clock_init.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/board/samsung/smdk5250/clock_init.c 
b/board/samsung/smdk5250/clock_init.c
index c009ae5..0ee65ae 100644
--- a/board/samsung/smdk5250/clock_init.c
+++ b/board/samsung/smdk5250/clock_init.c
@@ -434,10 +434,10 @@ void system_clock_init()
                val = readl(&clk->mux_stat_core1);
        } while ((val | MUX_MPLL_SEL_MASK) != val);
 
-       clrbits_le32(&clk->src_core1, MUX_CPLL_SEL_MASK);
-       clrbits_le32(&clk->src_core1, MUX_EPLL_SEL_MASK);
-       clrbits_le32(&clk->src_core1, MUX_VPLL_SEL_MASK);
-       clrbits_le32(&clk->src_core1, MUX_GPLL_SEL_MASK);
+       clrbits_le32(&clk->src_top2, MUX_CPLL_SEL_MASK);
+       clrbits_le32(&clk->src_top2, MUX_EPLL_SEL_MASK);
+       clrbits_le32(&clk->src_top2, MUX_VPLL_SEL_MASK);
+       clrbits_le32(&clk->src_top2, MUX_GPLL_SEL_MASK);
        tmp = MUX_CPLL_SEL_MASK | MUX_EPLL_SEL_MASK | MUX_VPLL_SEL_MASK
                | MUX_GPLL_SEL_MASK;
        do {
-- 
1.8.0

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to