Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message <20090331192117.gf24...@game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote: > > > > drivers/usb/Makefile > | 1 + > > > .../at91/usb.c => drivers/usb/atmel_usb.c | > 0 > > > rename cpu/arm926ejs/at91/usb.c => drivers/usb/atmel_usb.c (100%) > > > > > Same here, this is architecture specific code, why move it to generic cod> > > e? > it's the at91 usb drivers and we need to have it in the driver/usb
Why do we need to have it in the driver/usb ? Please explain in detail. > and it's not at91/arm926 specific but it's also shared with the at91rm9200 > > so I move to drivers usb > > please note that the RM9200 will be move to the at91 API next release So. Will it. Really? Who discussed this, and where, and when? Please explain in detail. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Weekends were made for programming. - Karl Lehenbauer _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
