On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 09:59:23AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > Tom, > > On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > >> Saw your reply but don't completely understand it. I think we'd still > >> like U-Boot to populate the memory property if possible and it sounds > >> like your patch would prevent that. One reason is that we'd like to > >> be able to handle different memory configurations (one of which is > >> 3.5G) with a single binary and have U-Boot just tell the kernel how > >> much space there is. > > > > So, I've been assuming that these are different platforms that you > > already append different device trees on, so that you use the same > > binary still and just different DTs. Is that not the case here? > > Current thought is that we'll even share a device tree between the two > boards since differences between the two are very minimal. Sorta like > how you can buy a Galaxy Nexus with 8G or 16G. They're the same > device (as far as I know) just with a different eMMC part stuffed on.
OK. I'll pick up this patch then, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
